Writing and Things
1. The article is about reclaiming the attention that readers used to have regarding newspaper. Because we have technology and faster ways of getting information, newspapers have to start creating and stylizing again, so that the reader wants to read it not just for the information, but for the style of the story, the action and suspense. Journalists thought for a while that to get better, they had to copy what the competition was doing. But that is not the way to go, because the competition does everything faster than the newspaper.
2. LEADS
Leads grab the readers attention, that's all they're there for. Nowadays in feature writing, journalists are starting to stray from the outline of "all the information goes in the first paragraph", and instead painting pictures, scenes, and writing actual stories instead of dumping information onto the paper. Journalists use misdirection, which manipulates the reader into thinking the story is about one thing, and then switching the entire story around to get at the actual serious story that the journalist reported. Mitch Albom says that those kinds of leads "arrest the readers attention" and prove for better feature writing when it comes to making it come to life.
3. THE MIDDLE
Albom talks about getting away from making sweeping broad statements and just barely scratching the surface of the matter. Tons of journalists do that and it doesn't capture and keep the readers attention as well as a real in depth story would. He suggests finding a person or people and talking to those individuals not just about the situation, but their lives how the work what they do and how much they make. After getting that information, then go into the serious situation at hand. Make the story personable and intimate.
4. THE END
A lot of journalists who are just starting out, tend to make the end of their article blunt, to the point and very out in the open. But this may not be the best thing to do. Mitch says that endings work better if they're subtle and hint at your position rather than just flat out saying what you think. If the ending is good enough it will stay with the reader, it will resonate with them, and you will have achieved your goal, which is to create a lasting impression on the reader when they have finished reading the piece.
I always try to liken good writing – the stuff that I read that I look at and put it down and say “wow” – is like dropping a stone or throwing a stone in a calm lake. The really good part of the writing is all the ripples that come as a result of it. The stone is the paragraph, the ripples are the way that it resonates.
I chose this quote mainly because I think it will help me with writing my own ending better, and also because i felt this way about the ending that was written in the piece that you read to us today. These sorts of endings, whether or not it's a journalistic piece or a novel, always manage to have me staring at a wall blankly and just thinking about it and pondering what exactly it meant.